Yes, but the purpose of this, once again, is to operate a public transit service. The principle is the same one as previously. If we want to go outside metropolitan areas, we will have to ensure that development can go ahead outside the boundaries of CMAs, because that is the point we're at now.
This amendment is consequential on the one we were discussing earlier. I want to allow a public transit association or authority to operate its network. We were talking about the definition earlier. I think we will probably arrive at a compromise where we say that the metropolitan area has to be served, but once we're outside the boundaries of the CMA, we have to allow for the development of sidings or spurs that maybe located outside the CMA.