It must be pointed out that section 95, in its current form, does not refer to noise. Noise was completely excluded from this section. This is what the 2000 decision was all about, when the agency lost jurisdiction in the area of noise. The agency used this provision to assume its responsibility with respect to noise, and the Court affirmed that this position had nothing whatsoever to do with noise. It deals with other damages that can occur.
In addition, I can tell you that we have absolutely no jurisprudence under this section.