Mr. Chair, I think we have reached a reasonable compromise with some of the other members, and I'm wondering if instead of having Mr. Laframboise move that motion, I could read into the record what I believe to be an agreement among at least some of the members, which would be satisfactory, on clause 95.1.
If everyone wants to look at the government's proposed consolidation of amendments, “When constructing or operating a railway, a railway company will cause as little noise or vibrations as possible, taking into account”, and then without going on, Mr. Chair, the balance of (a), (b), (c), and (d) would be the same.
So it would read:
95.1 When constructing or operating a railway, a railway company will cause as little noise or vibration as possible, taking into account
In fact I would change that to read “and/or vibrations” instead of just “or vibrations”.
Having talked to the drafters, Mr. Clerk, I would substitute “and” for the word “or”.
So it would read:
When constructing or operating a railway, a railway company will cause as little noise and vibration as possible, taking into account
And then (a) through (d) would remain consistent.