To that issue and to the advice we had from the clerk, the question I had written down is this: would the words of the legal counsel have made a difference? In other words, if we're drafting, which legal counsel, as opposed to a drafter...?
Your ruling related to the fact that a drafter was giving third-hand and second-hand comments or hearsay comments, if you want to call it that, from someone else. We didn't have the benefit of hearing them directly.
As a member of this committee, if I wanted to make an amendment, does it have to be done, as you're telling me, by naming a particular person who is only approved for this committee?
Secondly, do I understand correctly that the issue is on fumes? Is Mr. Laframboise criticizing the ruling because the inclusion of the word “fumes” is not acceptable?