What I would like to suggest, the advice that I've been given, is that this document, in my mind, would be third party, in the sense that there is one person making a comment on behalf of two other people. It is not from the actual people who were credited with the comments.
I understand that it was dealt with or that this decision was made on November 8. Collectively, the clerk and the counsel are suggesting to me that it is inadmissible. If anyone would like to see it, unfortunately, I don't have it in the English form, but it is actually a statement by someone referring to the comments of two other people. These are not actually the comments of the original people.