We certainly don't monitor the number of inspectors in Transport Canada. Our information comes from sources such as Justice Moshansky's talk last September.
I'd like to say again that we're not coming up with these ideas. I would like to directly quote from his paper, where he stated:
I now understand that senior transport officials have publicly conceded that lack of funding, again, is behind the current promotion of the Safety Management System concept, which on the face of it anticipates at least a measure of self-regulation by the carriers themselves.
That is a perception of Justice Moshansky. We see that kind of thing and we consider it ourselves.
We have certainly benefited from our participation in a consultation group like CARAC, from seeing, for example, the daily occurrence reports, where even small incidents were regularly made known within the industry so that you could see trends happening.
Then, a couple of years ago, the distribution of that kind of information was cut back because of concerns that the information might be confidential, might be misused, might be prejudicial to carriers, and so on.
We have certainly never abused having that kind of information. It made it possible for us to do exactly the kind of thing you're describing as a benefit of SMS, which is having the actual employees and the employees charged with safety responsibilities learning from small incidents, to avoid big incidents. That's a part of the culture of openness that we think must be continued.