No, I don't see that. That's the justification I've been given all the time. The reason I'm skeptical now, after listening to all of you, is that it would appear that the industry, including those who provide the services as well as the corporate industry, is being encouraged to comply and to provide information—to use your terms, to drill down and get to the root causes—because otherwise they wouldn't do it. That's always troubling to me, because I use the services quite a bit. I'm rather concerned that people are reluctant to come forward.
Now, if they have been reluctant to come forward with information that would make the service much more secure and much safer.... I hear Captain Holbrook telling me that perhaps this is not going to solve the problem, because people are not being given, first, the inducement, or second, the protection, to come forward.
There's a conflict, between a desire to establish a different culture and at the same time action that suggests that this culture is not going to come into being because the resources aren't going to be there.
If they're not there for Transport Canada, what would give me the confidence that the industry will put the resources in place?