Thank you for the question.
It's a difficult leap to make, to go from one's perception of what an airport's responsibility is in securing the environment today to that of a safety management system. You need to compare apples to apples. I don't know that the comparison is quite there just yet.
The airport responsibility of security is not 100%. What we're talking about here is an evolution of aviation safety and taking it to a whole new level where people on the ground who are working at an airport have a system in place that they can trust, that they can provide information into that can improve the system. So we're also talking about an additional way of making the regulatory environment improve safety over and above where it is today, at a quite high level.
We're confident that the people who work on the front lines at airports have the ability to participate in that kind of system, to ensure that airports are safe, when the proper regulations and the proper environment exist. Comparing it to security at an airport today where the lines are at varying points, they're drawn very differently than they are in anything else, because an airport is not responsible for all measures of security. There are certain things that an airport authority can and cannot do for airport security, so it's a difficult leap to make.
So we would argue that while there are some improvements that need to be made, including to this bill—and we've outlined some very specific improvements in our detailed submission, which will be distributed later—the parallel to security is a little bit difficult to make at this time.