Actually, Ontario is directly responsible only for my crossing. At the other crossings between Ontario and New York, it's either the Federal Bridge Corporation, or the federal side of the Buffalo and Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority, or the Blue Water Bridge Authority at Point Edward.
In the instance of my three bridges, yes, the province has a direct ability to intervene because the four commissioners are appointed by the premier. And believe me, we are very responsive to the interests of Ontario officials, given that they are the people we work for.
I don't quarrel with the minister's interest in having a role in tolls, fees, and other charges when it has a direct, devastating impact on border efficiency. Clearly that is a national interest; I cannot quarrel with it.
We're only concerned that we don't send the wrong message to financial markets, particularly the not-for-profit entities that float bonds in the public markets. In our case, we're able to float bonds that are tax-exempt in the United States, making our borrowing cost very low. But if those markets believe that our ability to set the revenue streams to satisfy the bonds may be impaired by the minister's activity, we're going to pay more to borrow the money.