Well, yes, I think there were comments.... I understand that when people are in political situations and so on, there are words said that may be heard with a different meaning than was intended. I think there were comments, but this was quickly corrected in the later weeks and months.
I'm referring to Mr. Martin, when he was asked at the convention--or after, I'm not sure--on November 12, what he would do now with the airport; Mr. Miller had been elected and he was against the bridge. And he said they would take their cue from the city.
I think some people thought this would be a very radical change. Mr. Martin was not in the government at the time; he had not taken office. The actions of the federal government before that were not leaning in that direction at all. But it left the impression that Toronto would dictate what the government should do.
This turned out to be not as nuanced as it could have been. There were ministers who intervened later to say that if a party to an agreement decides that it will quit the agreement, surely you expect that party to assume the cost of their decisions. But Mr. Miller was not prepared at all to do that.