Frankly, I'm not hoping, but can give you examples from preliminary implementation. In fact, this is not full implementation yet.
Companies who are embarking on this path can expect somewhere in the order of a 400% to 500% increase in reports. Assuming they follow up these appropriately—in other words, determine what the causes are and put appropriate corrective measures in place—we've seen a 60% reduction in occurrence reports. An occurrence report is for somebody who has actually been hurt, metal that's been bent, property that's been damaged and money that's been lost.
So that's the type of preliminary data we're starting to see in our industry already, and the system is not anywhere close to being mature.
I think you heard a couple of examples from ALPA, in terms of exactly what they're seeing, such as a bunch of data that doesn't make any sense, with incidents repeating—minor though they are—with indications of something more important. And when you go back there with all of that information, including potential violations, or potentially where someone has made an error, you fix those things before the error becomes fatal.
So again, the preliminary data is already there; it's not a speculation. Where it's implemented correctly and appropriately, we're seeing results already.