The key difference in reportability between FRA regulations and Canadian regulations is that when it comes to injuries, the FRA is much more stringent to a point.
In the FRA, for instance, if an employee chips a tooth at work, because it's technically a broken bone it is a reportable injury. That person can chip their tooth and continue working, but there is a responsibility and an obligation to report that to the FRA. Issues like that are included in the numbers. If they had a bee sting, went to a medical facility for a shot to counteract it, and got any type of prescription for an injury, they could go back to work but it would still be reportable because there was a prescription.
So the FRA standards on reportability are much more stringent than the Canadian standards.