I'd like to follow up on the question that Mr. Watson asked. I was going to ask a variation on the same thing. In your letter of March 13, page 2, item 7, you said, “Companies in our sector have a simple choice: they can break the laws and sacrifice safety, or they can go out of business.” What you did was a variation of that, not going out of business, but losing business because you wouldn't comply.
Your next sentence is the one I like, which Mr. Watson didn't have time to get to perhaps:
We are trying to create a third option and that is to change the law and the approach of Transport Canada so that everyone is competing on a level and safe playing field.
You won't have time in the one minute I have, but perhaps you could provide a little more detail on how you understand that third option and send that to the committee for distribution.