I remember I did cross-examine one of the previous Transport Canada officials on that subject. So this is not something new. I certainly agree that by way of prevention, the relationship with the airline industry, to try to prevent and educate so that accidents don't happen and best practices are done, is important, but so are regulatory indicators and enforcement of them. So if anything, there should be a duality.
To transfer all your beanies to one system, and to expect everybody to behave.... Listen, they're trying certain things in the food inspection industry where they have delegated certain things to the industry, but CFIA hasn't said they would make all their reports secret. This particular regime goes so much overboard that it creates a problem. If they don't realize that, if they did this risk assessment internally they'd say there's not much of a risk if they do it this way.
I think when the first accident happens and people start raising questions, when they see the first Transportation Safety Board report with “blank, blank, blank”, like some security intelligence report, they're going to wonder what's going on here. Why can't the public know what happened with this particular airline?