I understand that, and I can do that—a motion to defer is fairly well in order all the time—but I have to understand your reasoning here.
Given that the time has passed, I can understand that the motion is no longer in order—absolutely. Otherwise we'd be going back in time, which is not feasible, at least not that we're aware of. However, the other one has not passed. The minister has not yet reported. The amendment did not have a date. It said until such time as the minister has reported. How can you declare that caduque? It's still very much in play.