Mr. Chair, the motion very clearly called for a date—a reporting back by the minister—which has not been superseded by events. So Mr. Bélanger is absolutely right that the motion is in order. That is what is still to be discussed.
If the motion were defeated, you're right in saying that the main motion would have been superseded by the date change. But that presumes that the committee has turned down the amendment. The committee has not made that decision yet. Mr. Bélanger is absolutely right in maintaining that the amendment is still on the floor and still subject to discussion. That's where we were when we left off debate on this point. Monsieur Bélanger is absolutely correct on that.