No. I am confused.
My issue is the lack of regulatory supervision, and it's always there. We had an airline come up from California and do 50 internal flights flying hockey teams around, and there was no enforcement action on that. We hear those things every day, where management does not allow the inspectors to do their jobs. But there are basic fundamentals in doing your job, and that's creating a safe environment in the cockpit and in the company.
If you have people like this pilot, there's no provision to take a pilot's licence away in Canada. You lose your licence if you lose your medical. Other than that, it's in the pubic interest under the Aeronautics Act. So we don't have a system, as Paul suggests, of an organization of pilots—that might help—but there is no provision.
I'll give you a good example. There's a pilot in Sudbury who was flying down in Florida. He lived in Florida most of the time, so he got an American licence based on his Canadian one. The Americans have a provision called airman re-examination, where if somebody sees you doing something that's not safe, you're going to get a letter and you're going to have to talk to somebody, write to somebody, or do a flight test.
This particular pilot did a flight test with an FAA inspector and had his American licence taken away from him. He continued to fly with his Canadian licence because we don't have that provision. We cannot see a dangerous pilot and do anything about it.