Again, I'll repeat what I said. We want something that is as broad as possible in the event that we need other than safety management systems, and we know we may need other management systems. That's why we want to keep it broad.
Safety management system is already defined thoroughly. It's a very detailed definition in the CARs. I recognize here--I don't know who prepared the amendment--that it was borrowed from our CARs. We think there's a danger that if you put it in the act, you restrict the minister's enabling authority to come up with other types of management systems, if need be, down the road.
So that's why we want to keep it broad, and then you can narrow it down.