Again, Mr. Chair, I want to focus our attention on concerns that I raised and that were echoed by Ms. Stanfield. What we're trying to do is avoid ambiguity in the legislation. We're trying to avoid any needless litigation that will arise in the future because of the wording of the clause.
Ms. Stanfield, are you satisfied that, given the way the current bill is worded, without this particular amendment, the desires expressed here at this table, especially by the opposition side, to achieve the “highest standards possible” will actually be met by the current bill rather than by this amendment? Is the amendment we're talking about necessary to achieve what the members at this table--I think--generally want to achieve?