I was just going to say I was looking for a cooperative approach from the member, and the only approach I heard is that he wants to eliminate the designated organizations. Or did I misunderstand that? That's what I understood it to be.
Certainly we're prepared, as the government, to implement a three-year coming into force for this proposed section. Certainly I understand Mr. Julian's perspective in relation to the high risk, to change the wording from a negative to a positive. I think that is a good suggestion, and indeed I'd look forward to a friendly amendment from that.
But I think the other reality is that after the other section we voted on, the minister has an obligation, an oversight responsibility. He still maintains a responsibility. He can designate that responsibility. Certainly he designates most responsibility to someone. I'm certain he's not going through each plane and inspecting them himself. But I think it would make sense that if there is an organization out there that has expertise in that particular field—and I'm suggesting in a narrow field, such as gliders or ultralights, or indeed an organization such as the crop sprayers organization—I would think they would be better fit than the minister would be or even the experts at Transport Canada.
But I'm looking to the Bloc and also to the NDP. Are they prepared to accept those two amendments, make friendly amendments to that? The government would be prepared to accept that.