Thank you.
I'm trying to clarify my understanding of what we're doing. I'm relating it, I guess, to the rail safety issue, and that's what I would like. I realize that's not your area directly. But I'm referring to proposed section 5.392 in the binder we have here, and I'm looking at proposed subsection 5.392(1), which says, “any information disclosed under the process”. I'm thinking of the audit that was ordered against the rail companies, and I'm seeing a parallel here. If it says “becomes confidential”, I have a problem in that the rail information couldn't be made available to this committee and public at the time because it was a third party. What I see here is saying that if an audit is ordered—I thought I heard you earlier use the term “audit”—it would remain confidential.