We set ourselves the objective of doing our research. I would probably be prepared to accept the department's position regarding the confidentiality of the audits. However, I have a problem. I bring to your attention the statement that Mr. Louis Ranger made before us on November 7, 2006. He said: “TC plans to continue withholding such audits by treating them as confidential, commercial or technical information.” I am prepared to accept the department's position, but, if the audits are not made public and are considered confidential documents under the new act, that poses a problem. I want to follow you, but, last time, you told us the audits would be made public. You're removing the names of the audits; I understood that.
On June 6th, 2007. See this statement in context.