You've convinced me that this situation should apply only to audits. However, when I do research on audits, and I hear statements such as Mr. Ranger's or information such as that provided by Mr. Julian, I have reservations. Some reports are not available. That's what has to be settled.
If you don't do anything else, I'm going to be forced, for lack of anything better, to side with Mr. Julian—pardon me for this comment, Peter—whose amendment states:
(d) the information is required to be disclosed under an Act of Parliament.
Information that must not be disclosed pursuant to a federal act will not be disclosed. That is not what I would have liked. I would have liked a provision to state that audits will be made public and that that is consistent with the Access to Information Act. That would suit me completely. The problem is that I am not convinced. That is why I support Mr. Julian's amendment, even though I would have liked us to arrive at something clearer.