I still come back to the same problem, because I don't have a better provision.
You've convinced me that the audits are the only documents that must be made public because you have the opportunity to remove everything that is personal or other similar things. Subsequently, however, when it is seen that entire pages are erased, do not appear and so on, does everyone find that normal? Do you find that normal?
I wonder whether there wouldn't be a way of saying that there will be investigation reports and that that is what will be made public, and that there will indeed be personal information that is not required to be disclosed, and so on. Moreover, you explained to us that, in an investigation report, you remove all the personal information and try just to give the general drift.
That is indeed what you explained to us at the outset?