I was all in favour of Monsieur Laframboise's amendment until I heard from Mr. Bélanger. I think it could call into question, in the interpretation, whether or not employees would be covered. I think that's a very valid point. I never thought about that.
But because we're including one group specifically, does that mean the rest are to be left out? I agree with Mr. Bélanger. I think it's very airtight now, Monsieur Laframboise; “any” is fairly clear in English, as far as not being able to have any recourse.