I understand, but presumably we have to move in one direction at some point.
The notion that he has in subsections (2) and (3).... Basically, if we adopt--and I hope this committee will--subsection (2), that the Canada Labour Code applies, and we include that for greater certainty in the act, then that section would not be necessary.
Finally, I'd be concerned that subsection (2) would be prescriptive to the point that it would be the only remedy available. That's certainly not the intent. I would expect, and I need confirmation of it, that whether this remedy is mentioned in the law or not, it will exist.
By singling this out in the bill, could it be seen that this is the remedy and there is nothing else?
Those are three difficulties I want to flag. That's why I won't support this amendment.