This is also consistent with legislation being proposed in Michigan. Border authority legislation has been tabled by a number of different representatives with regard to having a public border authority. So it is consistent.
This is the practice in many jurisdictions. They might have a different model that includes compensation and what not. Once again, I say, if there is the interest of the minister to do so, this empowers him to do that, his ability. If people, of their own volition, want to sit in some type of advisory capacity that assists in the facilitation of municipal, provincial, and federal issues related to the border, where there is a void, this allows that. Once again, it does not trump any other existing border authority or commission and it does not provide for a mandate for the minister to have to do this. This is an expressed option that could be provided without remuneration and then not requiring royal assent.