Is the concern of the department the issue of a reduction in capacity rather than an expansion of capacity? An expansion of capacity on the crossing itself, be it a tunnel or bridge, really doesn't have any effect. It's governed by, as one of you called it, the end of the funnel at each end, and those are the road links, the highway connections.
If an operator wants to expand, connections will be required on each end. The capacity is there. Do I understand that the department's concern would be that someone might want to reduce capacity and therefore have a negative impact on the capacity to handle international trade between the U.S. and Canada?