To the researchers, concerning this amendment, how does this compare with U.S. legislation with regard to their sale? This seems to really limit the scope of that. We've seen controversies on infrastructure sales recently in the United States, with the Dubai issue.
I think this would be different from what they have in the U.S. We do have joint ownership of some of this infrastructure, because of the 24 international crossings that are bridges or tunnels for car and vehicular traffic, only two are privately held. The others ones are jointly owned by governments.