What I am informed—and this is the reason I'm having it.... I wouldn't look for the minister to find something that would intervene or.... Maybe I'm mistaken in terms of procedural legislation here, but I wouldn't be expecting that the minister would be putting in something that would violate another act.
But in the CP Rail tunnel, for example, where we have chlorine gas transported through the city of Windsor, the fire department doesn't have access to the site to provide training or inspect the hazardous materials. They have to make a request to CP Rail in order to enter the property to do that. Wouldn't it make sense for the minister of these infrastructures to have the capacity or require some type of preventative measure?
The question back to the department would be, if the minister did so within the context of the other legislation, how would that violate or break any law?