I appreciate the comment, Mr. Harvey, but the intention wasn't to limit. The intention was, I guess, to provide some direction or priority or focus, in terms of what would be considered. That's why I want to make it clear that removing the word “only” would have been limiting, and it was the intention to ensure that it consider the following factors, to give some direction to people to know that what it is we're expecting will be the main concern, and to maybe depoliticize, to some degree, and ensure that there's a businesslike focus on the kinds of decisions that are made, rather than potentially being wide open. I am concerned, because of the nature of the crossings, or the importance of them, and the fact that there are only two of them that are privately held, that they're done in a fair way and that it's less political and more businesslike and more rational.
On June 8th, 2006. See this statement in context.