I must admit that I'm not fully aware of the U.S. legislation.
One thing I would add is that the rationale for having control over the transfer is in fact consistent with the same rationale to have, initially, GIC approval to build the bridge. In other words, if you come and ask the GIC for permission to build a bridge, there will be, of course, assessments of the need for the bridge, and so on and so forth, but the GIC will undoubtedly look at your actual capacity to do it, and there will be a series of things, all kinds of things.
Here what will happen is the GIC will look at everything that has nothing to do with the new bridge, because the bridge will already exist, but it will nevertheless look at all the criteria in terms of who will operate it, the intent, the plans, and all of that. In that sense, the same spirit will go with the assessment of the transfer that should normally go with the initial authorization.