In fact, let me clarify, because I recently had a very detailed meeting with my colleagues who are responsible for this act. In fact, there are various distinctions of dangerous goods. Any infrastructure operator, any company that carries goods, has to have an emergency response action plan under the act. Under that action plan, they have to deal with how the dangerous goods will be treated, where they are allowed to travel, and the labelling in terms of the toxicity of the good.
They also have to see if they're carried by water. If there is a spill over a body of water, they have to plan for how they will deal with the marine pollutants. That would be the case on a bridge—if something happens on the bridge and it goes into the water.
They have to consider all these facts in this emergency response assessment plan. That plan is approved by our inspectors at Transport Canada. We do have dangerous goods inspectors. Anytime there is a spill or a derailment, our people get out there, along with other emergency responders, to deal with the emergency response.
So those procedures are already in place. If you would like more information, we could get our dangerous goods people to provide it to you. But that planning process is already on the go, and it's already approved by the department.