I think you just answered your own question, Mr. Masse. Perhaps the best act to be addressing those points isn't the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act—not in this one, because this one pertains just to a bridge, which is an extension of the highway; that's all it is. A rail tunnel is an extension of the rail line. So whatever you do at the tunnel or the bridge, you would have to do the same on the rest of the infrastructure that goes with it. When they do a plan, they're doing a plan for the whole entity.
You're right about the railways, but they do have their own police forces to implement their security and safety plans. Our inspectors go there and make inspections, as you know, from recent incidents on the rail safety plan.
So we're not disagreeing with your point that maybe the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act needs to be looked at and made more rigorous. But it should be that act; it shouldn't be this act.