If you're talking about the power to order people to do things, no, we don't have that in our legislation. There's a reason for that. It has been the thinking here in Canada, and around the world, in the U.S., Australia, and New Zealand, for example, that the regulator and the investigative body should be separate. This has been the model that Canada has followed since the early 1990s.
It's really a matter of independence. In the investigations, we may be looking at the regulator, we may be looking at their actions, we could be looking at steps they have taken; we need to be able to comment on those things. So the model that's used in Canada is a separation between the regulator and the independent accident investigator.
Just on the first point you made, in terms of advocating for the changes that are necessary, we feel we've been very successful in advocating for safety improvements. Each of the recommendations is put on our website; the response is on our website, and our assessment of that response is there. This is something we've been doing recently, and we have found it to be very effective. The feedback has been quite good on that.