I appreciate that and I want to make sure we always do the right thing. I'm wondering whether the message I get when I read this is the correct one.
The message I get is that a port authority, for example the new Port of Vancouver, would have the responsibility to ensure that the minister for national security conduct an annual security check on its port before it could do anything else. And if the minister for national security, through his officials, were delinquent in that exercise, what penalties would there be for the port authority for not having ensured that the minister for national security refrain from his delinquency?