Not if you have a workable set of criteria to do it with, and indeed we're working on a minor works policy right now that would do that. It sets up a number of criteria: sinuosity, how quickly it turns, depth, width, and the number of deadfall going over.
We're talking very small waterways to start to pull this stuff off, waterways that right now require the forestry industry, for example, which goes into an area it wants to cut every spring, to build 3,000 temporary bridges over these little creeks that nobody has ever taken a canoe or a kayak into and would never ever want to because it takes so long to get into them. By our law, every single one of those requires a dedicated application and approval, which takes time.
As long as you get your criteria right up front, and we've been working with the Forest Products Association of Canada, the Transportation Association of Canada, and other associations to try to work on criteria whereby we could define those types of very minor waterways to start such a list—waterways that do not support navigation, that nobody wants to navigate down and forseeably never will.