Yes, we do. As a start, I think I alluded earlier to our minor waterways policy, which is just about ready to be put in place.
If it winds back and forth so often that it takes you a week to go five feet forward, there's no need to apply, because nobody's going to want to do that. It just doesn't make sense. If there's so much natural deadfall across the waterway or so many natural obstructions in the water that you're portaging more than you're in your boat, there's no need to apply. If the depth of the particular waterway for the bulk of the year--and we have measures for this--is so minimal that you won't be there, there's no need to apply.
We started with five. We actually had the Forest Products Association of Canada test this in the field for us. Could they self-measure this and therefore self-regulate? They came back last summer and gave us some input. We've modified it, and I think we're working now on six.
It wouldn't be that you would hit, for example, one criteria and then pull yourself off. When we say no need to apply, we're taking it off that navigability map forever. So you have to hit two, not just one, criteria. You'd have to hit two. That's what we're working with right now as our proposed policy statement on this. That would create, for example, that lowest level of approval in that new world we envision.