I would like to respond, if I may, because I didn't answer one of his questions, and actually a comment made earlier. Mr. Bell is here now.
My understanding is that before Easter, the railway review will be tabled. So I think that's the other thing--we have maybe two weeks in which we can deal with navigable waterways, and then I would suggest that after we've had probably a week to review that when we receive it, you know there are going to be other questions. It may be possible that the committee will say we have to put navigable waterways aside for a little while, and now let's concentrate on the rail study.
That's the sense of urgency that I have. I know we have some things coming back. We may have that legislation that you speak of next week or the week after that. I would just like to fill our agenda, because we have at least next week where we could fill our agenda and certainly get correspondence out to the provinces, and we could find out who wants to make a submission. Maybe they want to make it in writing or in person. That way we can keep the agenda going for at least two weeks, and then probably the rail study might be part of the agenda, or indeed some of the legislation that you've suggested or something of an emergency nature that would come up.