No, but at the risk of sounding a little bit too concise, I'm going to reflect on the issue that we discussed when we met as a steering committee, and that was that yes, we were going to go ahead with navigable waterways after we had listened to the department, and that we would make an additional decision on the extent to which we would engage the time and energy of this committee.
So I'm still in that vein. I'm not suggesting that we don't do it. I'm simply looking at where we would go from there. You're asking me to speculate on what's going to happen after we listen to the department today and what kind of timetable we'd put forward. Because you asked me to speculate, I've responded by saying that we have other issues on the table that we can now address, simply because it appears that we are going to be afforded the time to do some valuable work.