I have 20 seconds left, but I'm going to try to get two more questions in.
First, can these changes not be done by regulation? Do they need to be in legislation?
Second, is it possible to have an environmental assessment that, if they see...? The common complaint I hear in my area is that an environmental assessment costs $150,000 to put a culvert across a creek that flows for about three days a year. It does happen a lot.
I see you shaking your head in agreement,
Now, could there be a different environmental assessment, or two different ones, or three different ones, depending on the size of the project, to say, okay, at first blush, phase one, phase two, and phase three environmental assessments will be done on contaminated sites? Could there be a system like that in place?