Ms. Scharf and Mr. Grady, in your presentation you referenced the suggestion of removing named works from the Navigable Waters Protection Act for quicker approval because they're now a significant interference to navigation, and then you referred to causeways, dams, and booms. I can think of no greater interference to navigation than a dam, a causeway, or a boom. What am I missing here? If you do that, then we don't have a Navigable Waters Protection Act at all.
On March 11th, 2008. See this statement in context.