I believe Keith will have some comments on the last question, but on that issue, it is our understanding that the intent is not to miss the major causeways or dams. The way the act is structured now, we must go through the full approval process and have site access, and that can lead to a lot of delays.
Because we don't have the specific amendments in front of us on the details of how they're defined, that makes it a bit more of a challenge. But the larger point is that they had to be designed for flexibility, but in a way that safeguards them. The way it's written now, there's no way to get that flexibility.
We're not suggesting it isn't important or significant, but there's no flexibility.