Getting back to the point that was made earlier, I think what we're looking for is exactly that. It's to make sure we focus our EA resources and our regulatory resources on those projects that we feel have the most likelihood of adverse environmental effects. In the case of relatively minor projects there may be, and very often are, other means of addressing potential effects. For example, we've talked about minor works and what constitutes a minor waterway, for example. Those small streams can have important environmental factors associated with them, spawning habitat for fish and so forth, but the Fisheries Act is there to ensure that fish habitat is protected without necessarily the need for an environmental assessment process to apply.
So I think at the end of the day what's being suggested or proposed here is quite reasonable.