Mr. Chair, I don't know if that's it for the questions, or if we're getting down to closing remarks, but as far as my closing comments to the committee are concerned, first of all, I really want to thank you, Mr. Chairman, and the committee, for hearing us here today and for undertaking this whole process. I can't stress to you how important it is to rural Canada to have the definition of a navigable waterway changed. That is number one. The definition has to move away from a water system that doesn't flow for more than three months—it has to. It's imperative if we want to build this country the way we want it to be built. There's an approval process that we have to go through in that regard, then. When we're applying to the federal government under the Building Canada Fund, or whatever programs are out there, and we're delayed and miss the application process, we lose the money.
So I can't stress to you, Mr. Chairman and the committee, how important it is for all of rural Canada to have this definition changed.
Thank you.