You asked two questions. Certainly in generalizing that phrase to deal with works rather than simply bridges, we have included everything that was built prior to 1995. I acknowledge that. Perhaps my friends in Transport Canada can better advise as to whether there are a significant number of works as opposed to dams, bridges, and that sort of thing out there that do pose a difficulty that we would allow to slip through under this.
Under the second part of your question, I'm not entirely certain what we're getting at here. Certainly if you have difficulty with our first suggestion, something that would allow a cursory review by Transport Canada of every work when we replace it, without the need to undergo advertising, and so on, would be much more palatable than the way the act currently sits. I do not think it's feasible for Transport Canada to look at everything that is out there. First, they don't know, because they weren't approved; and second, there are an awful lot of them.