Sure. Let me start with that. Thank you very much for the question.
First, as I said earlier, the border works reasonably well for rail. That being said, there are a number of issues that we very much want to continue to pursue with our U.S. colleagues.
There are a number of specific issues on the harmonization of procedures and processes, some of them having to do with operating rules, so we can move trains more efficiently. For example, there are different rules in the U.S. than there are in Canada with respect to where you should position cars that have dangerous goods in them relative to the power unit on the train. There are these sorts of things.
We'd like to get a standardized approach to that sort of thing. It would be much more efficient at the border if we could do that. There are things like where we switch crews. We'd like to get a wider zone at the border. So there are a number of technical things in that area that would make a significant difference in terms of efficiency at the border.
Another one that, frankly, is very egregious and that we're very annoyed with, if I can put it bluntly, is that the Americans are now charging us $7.75 for an agricultural inspection fee for every car that goes across the border. Well, I'm here to tell you that we don't move a lot of tomatoes. But every car that goes across the border gets charged this fee. And we frankly feel that it's quite egregious, and we'd like to see the U.S. government address that question and change that.
Yes, there are a bunch of issues that we want to continue to address in the longer term. There are questions on the broader infrastructure, such as, in your area, the CP tunnel, and on further infrastructure improvements on the U.S. side of the border, particularly in the Detroit area. Some of those issues are also with us.