Thank you very much.
Also, you asked the question as to why they plan on removing the substantial commercial harm test, and I have to tell you--practising law, I have seen that test before--it's very hard to meet the standard required and it's very expensive to prove the evidence itself, and I think you're aware of that. That's why I think the test has to go, quite frankly.
We have heard some evidence in relation to costs and I'm interested in finding out more. Of course, my understanding is that under the act, mediation is required before group FOA is even able to take place. I understand mediation costs somewhere over $100,000. I understand lawsuits would cost, probably, a minimum of $500,000, simply from my interest in the past--I don't know if that's the case, but I would suggest at least--and group final-offer arbitration could cost less than $10,000. Indeed, for smaller companies this is an awesome opportunity, especially because, as a group, they can pool their resources to, in essence, take on Goliath.
I'd like your comments on that.