May I comment on that last point, because I do understand exactly what you're saying. I'll make two comments about it.
First of all, there is currently in legislation a provision for an expedited FOA that would be lower cost. That's in there for claims of smaller amounts, and we have done those. They have a 30-day trigger, and of necessity they require the dedication of fewer resources on both sides. That's just one general comment.
My other comment on the group FOA is that I've heard a couple of times now the comment that this shouldn't take us by surprise because it has been there for a while, and that's correct. When it was first introduced, however, it contained a provision that said that the remedy being requested by the shipper—and the shipper sets the ground rules in any FOA—should apply equally to all. So if a group of shippers get together and they decide “We have an issue, it's common to us, and we now need a remedy”, under the original drafting, that remedy as they state it had to apply equally to all of them--you know, whether it's a cents-per-tonne mile or whatever. We're saying that has now been removed, and we'd like to see clarity, the kind of clarity there had been to indicate that we wouldn't be fighting, in effect, 20 FOAs all at once, but rather one.