From a Transport Canada perspective, it's a major project we would have undertaken even with these amendment proposals we have in front of you. I'm not familiar with the specific file and details, but I can envision exactly the same process with these amendments as it would have undergone then. It is indeed a major project structure going across a major waterway, which would necessarily generate careful review from a navigational aspect. So we would trigger...as we trigger today.
On June 3rd, 2008. See this statement in context.